New research from Alaska on how climate change affects things built on or in permafrost — like highways, buildings and underground pipes — shows this type of infrastructure will deteriorate faster than expected.
The study, published in May in the scientific journal the Cryosphere, involved a detailed analysis and computer modeling of data from a section of the Dalton Highway, the supply haul road to Alaska’s oil-rich North Slope.
The study’s authors included University of Alaska Fairbanks Geophysical Institute permafrost researcher Vladimir Romanovsky, who says the work will better inform engineers and planners in the future.
Vladimir Romanovsky: You can apply this model for larger areas, for example, for the entire North Slope of Alaska, and describe the impact of roads, on permafrost, both the impact of roads, and also impact of changing climate. So that’s kind of a new thing that make this paper very different from typical engineering calculations for modeling for specific infrastructure.
Casey Grove: If there’s more warming or more effects from the warming than expected, should people be alarmed about things like the pipeline or other highways that might be degrading because of that?
Vladimir Romanovsky: Well, definitely they do. For a long time, it was the accepted opinion that permafrost on the North Slope of Alaska is cold and stable, and you shouldn’t worry about anything. So this paper shows that it’s not exactly true, even in our present climate, which is, of course, much warmer than it was 20 or 30 years ago when most of this engineering opinion was formed about the North Slope of Alaska.
This shows that even now, already, by now, the warming of climate is so substantial that even at some locations, the thawing of permafrost could start around the this highways.
Now, another example is the sewer and water pipes in the villages on the North Slope of Alaska along the coast. Again, engineers were under the impression that you can bury these pipelines in the ground, and permafrost will be still stable will be okay. But Point Lay right now — it’s a small village on the North Slope — they are experiencing huge problems. The problem is that because they followed the recommendations of engineers, and they just buried this pipes and now it’s a mess. It’s a huge problem for the village.
Casey Grove: Is one of the lessons from this, that you just can’t build that kind of infrastructure in permafrost areas, or that you just have to do it differently?
Vladimir Romanovsky: Yes, you have to do it differently. The roads — there’s still lots of research is going on right now. But there is still not kind of universal good recipe of how to build roads on permafrost without impacting it so much that you will have to spend lots of money to maintain the roads and good conditions.
For pipes it’s different. For places like Point Lay where permafrost is very, very ice-rich, it is impossible to expect that buried pipelines will continue to function properly. There is no way to do it. The solution that is used in Russia villages, and even in bigger cities on permafrost, build all pipes above the ground. Of course, it looks ugly. Of course, aesthetically it’s not great, but it is a solution.
And of course, you still have to spend some energy or some engineering measures to not to allow water to freeze. That’s another thing. So you have to do good thermal insulation. In general, there are some engineering solutions, but they may be prohibitively too expensive to use in many cases.