Iditarod mushers racing their dogs to Nome this year are doing it with a smaller team on the gangline. The race reduced the maximum team size from 16 to 14. This means quite a bit for race strategies, speeds and the trade-offs that mushers face as they travel across Alaska.
Just a day before the race began, defending Iditarod champion Joar Leifseth Ulsom, was facing a tough decision on which dogs to bring to the starting chute.
He hadn’t chosen his 14 dogs.
This year, competitive mushers like Leifseth Ulsom had to be extra choosy in building their lineup.
“I really thought 16 dogs was kind of something that made this race unique and special. Just one of the things, you know?” Leifseth Ulsom said. “Personally I would like to run 16 dogs, but we’ll see how it goes this year. Maybe I’ll like it, we’ll see.”
Over the course of a race, there are eight fewer booties to change, less food to pack and eight fewer paws that need ointment. And that’s one of the main reasons why the Iditarod Board of Directors changed the rule: because of the potential for enhanced dog care. But more dogs mean more pulling and climbing power for mushers looking to move quickly across the country.
Nenana musher Aaron Burmeister said he has mixed emotions. He likes racing 16 dogs and even the 20-dog teams that were allowed when he first started racing.
“Do we need that dog power? No. In today’s Iditarod, with the nutrition, the training, with the evolving of the sled dogs and the incredible athletes they are, you really don’t need more than 12,” Burmeister said.
The Iditarod joins other top races in restricting mushers to smaller teams. The 1,000-mile Yukon Quest only allows 14 dogs, and a few years ago Kuskokwim 300 dropped from 14 to 12 dogs.
Four-time Iditarod winner Martin Buser doesn’t like the new rule, saying it puts heavier mushers at a slight disadvantage.
“I want to maintain an open mind. Maybe we’re selecting a little tighter, so maybe the 14 dogs have no question marks in them. If we have a buffer of 16 or even 20 dogs, we would maybe take a dog that could be left behind,” Buser said. “I don’t mind going one year with 14 dogs, even though we know it’s not because of strategy or race statistics. It’s simply done because of money savings for the race committee, and that’s why I don’t agree with the rule.”
Buser is referring to the hundreds of dogs that are dropped each year in remote checkpoints. Veterinarians and volunteers in checkpoints watch over the dogs before the Iditarod Air Force flies them back to Anchorage.
Mushers have never been required to start with 16 dogs, and some teams chose in the past to start with a smaller string. But more dogs means more options. Mushers can bring a young dog that will gain valuable racing experience but doesn’t need to make the full trip to Nome. And in recent years, some mushers have experimented with carrying a few dogs in the sled bag or in a trailer to both modulate speed and bank extra rest. A smaller team complicates the developing strategy.
2017 winner Mitch Seavey would prefer to stick with 16.
“I predict that mushers are going to be more reluctant to return dogs from the trail. I think they’re going to want to keep them in the team as long as possible,” Seavey said. “I personally would rather see it stay at 16. I think it’s a diminished race, and I think it’s a little bit more stress and pressure put on fewer dogs. We’ve shown we can handle 16 year after year, so that’s really not a problem.”
Once the race is down to the last few days, mushers typically drop their slower dogs and sometimes finish with small teams. When they pass beneath the burled arch, they can finish with as few as five.