Why Attu Island is still fighting WWII

A large fuel tank on Attu

A large fuel tank on Attu. (Photos by Deborah Rudis, courtesy U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service)

Attu Island is overdue for some spring cleaning. Seventy years after World War II, the island is still littered with shards of old Coke bottles, lead-based batteries, leaking fuel drums and unexploded artillery.

This summer, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, which manages the remote island as a refuge, will survey the extent of World War II debris and contamination. As KTOO’s Kelsey Gobroski reports, the entire ecosystem could be affected by the decades of pollution.

 

 


Attu gave biologist Deborah Rudis goosebumps. Until her first visit to the island in 2007, Rudis had only seen Attu’s past while sifting through decades of documents for her job at Juneau’s U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service office. She plans to return this summer with a team of other scientists to catalog the clean-up work that needs to be done.

Rudis says evidence of military occupation sticks around on Attu.

“It’s such a wet environment that all the surface water continues to flow and meet the creeks and go downstream,” Rudis says. “In a few places you just sort of kick into the edge of the stream bank and you could release some product coming out into the water and you could see the oil slick just move downstream.”

During her 2007 visit, Rudis shared the island with a few Coast Guardsmen and two other biologists. Now the Coast Guard station is closed.

Asphalt barrel dump

Asphalt barrel dump in the Attu tundra. (Photos by Deborah Rudis, courtesy U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service)

She is a contaminants biologist and was on Attu to survey the pollution. She calls the hydrocarbon pollutants “product” because there’s more than just oil.

There’s bunker C and there’s lubricants and there’s different oils and there’s diesel fuels,” says says.

World War II’s Aleutian campaign is sometimes called the “Thousand Mile War.”  The U.S. military built a base on Attu and deployed 15,000 U.S. troops there.  Rudis says about 2,000 Japanese soldiers dug into the ground or navigated caves for shelter. Cliffs and mountains separated the two bases.

The U.S. retook Attu from the Japanese in 1943 in the only World War II battle on American soil.

Rudis followed the trail of troop supplies while surveying Attu. She counted thousands of fuel barrels; many so rusted only the skeletal rings remained.  Their contents had pooled and solidified, creating an asphalt lot in the middle of the Aleutian tundra, an example of the pollution of war.

“When WWII was over they just left it, and even in the 70s and the 80s when the Navy or other military entities left other places in the Aleutians, they left it behind. They left their buildings, they left the coffee cups on the table, they  left their papers. It’s amazing when you go in there and you see this stuff. Now, on Attu most of it’s pretty well gone and decayed, but the contaminants were not considered an issue and of course they wouldn’t have been back then because it was a war situation.”

Unexploded ordnances also litter the island, but are marked sporadically. Rudis says a Naval Disposal Unit tried to minimize the risk of explosive accidents, but the plan backfired.

They thought they could blow them up and it would neutralize them so-to-speak, but a lot of things don’t totally blow up, or they’re buried in the bottom of the pile,” Rudis says.

Attu is one of about 10,000 Formerly Used Defense Sites nationwide.  The Department of Defense has about $250 million each year to whittle away at some of the 2,700 sites that need cleaning up.

An Attu clean up could cost tens of millions of dollars and stretch out more than a decade.

Kenneth Andraschko is the manager of Formerly Used Defense Sites in Alaska. He says it could be two to five years before an Attu clean up would get underway.

A fuel tank spill.

A fuel tank spill. (Photos by Deborah Rudis, courtesy U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service)

The Fish and Wildlife Service will fund this summer’s survey.

“We don’t own that land, we don’t manage that land, we being Department of Defense,” Andraschko says. “Fish and Wildlife might have to look at some of the areas to determine what they want to keep, what is culturally significant to them, what areas they want disturbed, not disturbed, before the Corps of Engineers on behalf of DOD goes in and does a remediation.”

Fish and Wildlife Service historian Debbie Corbett will join Rudis and the other scientists this summer to survey old Attu battlefields for the first time.  She has been to Attu before to study Aleut artifacts.

“It’s sort of like a World War II version of Gettysburg, where you’ve got the troop movements and the actual battle. You can see where the battle was fought,” she says.

Corbett says World War II artifacts weren’t seen as old or special enough to preserve until recently.  She aims to leave things where they’re found whenever possible; where she finds an object helps her understand how it was used and what was around it.

“I’m trying to get people to think of this as a landscape. Not just as isolated objects on the ground or a cluster of buildings or a runway, but the whole thing as a unified picture,” she says.

This summer the Fish and Wildlife team will get to Attu by sea. The Coast Guard station’s abandoned runway needs a safety check before planes can land; the Corps of Engineers is making it a priority to clean up Attu before the runway decays – eventually reclaimed by the tundra.


View Attu Island in a larger map