A cyber-security firm is reporting that Alaska was targeted by hackers using computers in China.
The company, Recorded Future, documents repeated attempts to connect to several networks in Alaska before and after the state sent a trade delegation to China in May.
According to the report, the scanning activity spiked when Gov. Bill Walker announced the visit to China in March and again just after the delegation left the country.
The data shows that Alaska Communications Systems Group, or ACS, and Alaska Power and Telephone Company were targeted in addition to the state’s Department of Natural Resources.
There’s evidence that the scanning came from internet connections registered to Tsinghua University in Beijing.
Walker’s administration is pushing back against the report.
Press Secretary Austin Baird said there was web traffic targeting the state but no hack actually happened.
“The state of Alaska like most state governments, like most businesses, like most companies that do business online or do business internationally, there’s routinely anonymous activity on the perimeter networks that amounts to someone checking if the door is locked,” Baird said.
Baird said the state does not believe that China was the original source of the scanning activity.
He said the state contacted law enforcement as a precautionary measure but doesn’t plan to do any further investigation into the source of the web traffic.
Alaska has a lot going on right now.
Never miss the important parts with insightful (and entertaining) news from The Signal, the best weekly Alaska news email.
- The law firm, Consovoy McCarthy, has strong ties to President Donald Trump and conservative legal causes nationwide. It's fighting Alaska unions.
- He acknowledged a need to empower others across the system. "No one person, including me, has all the answers," he said.
- The downgrade is only one notch in S&P’s rating system, from AA- to A+. S&P's analyst says an A is the average rating for higher education public institutions in the United States.
- The fees resulted from a court case over whether the initiative should have been certified to be on the ballot. It was intended to increase salmon habitat protections.