Among 100-plus proposals, Sitka’s sac roe herring fishery a top issue

The Sitka sac roe herring fishery operates just beyond the windows where the Board of Fish is seated. The industry wants the current management plan to stay in place, while a local cohort calling themselves the “Herring Rock Water Protectors” has aligned with Sitka Tribe of Alaska for more conservative management. (Photo by Emily Kwong/KCAW)

The Sitka sac roe herring fishery operates just beyond the windows where the Board of Fish is seated. The industry wants the current management plan to stay in place, while a local cohort calling themselves the “Herring Rock Water Protectors” has aligned with Sitka Tribe of Alaska for more conservative management. (Photo by Emily Kwong/KCAW)

Sitka is the center of gravity for fish politics — at least this week, as the Alaska Board of Fisheries is in town reviewing over 100 finfish proposals.

With its waters visible outside the window of Harrigan Centennial Hall, Sitka Sound, the site of the Sitka sac roe herring fishery, is one of the biggest battles this cycle.

The controversial Sitka herring fishery is relatively small with 48 permit holders.

Scientists, managers, fisherman, and subsistence harvesters are sipping coffee out of plastic cups and organizing their talking points in side rooms.

For lifelong Sitka fisherman Eric Jordan, who once sat on the board, the first day is a reunion.

“You visit with each other and bring up old things, old battles that you fought,” he said.

While the commercial industry harvests the eggs from inside the fish once caught, subsistence harvesters set out hemlock branches after the fleet leaves.

The herring spawn and lay their eggs.

But with thinning eggs on the branches, fear is escalating within Sitka Tribe of Alaska that the local stock is on the verge of collapse.

The tribe began voicing concern over the spawn in 1997.

Louise Brady and other members of the Kiks.ádi clan organized a koo.éex, or potlatch, on Jan. 14 to honor the herring.

“Last year, I think, made it clear that we are close to losing our herring eggs,” Brady said.

Before the koo.éex, Brady entered the kitchen at the Alaska Native Brotherhood Hall where Nina Vizcarrando was preparing food.

Opening the fridge, both were disgruntled there was only one bowl of herring eggs to go around.

“This is the amount for today,” Brady said.

“For 150, 200 people,” Vizcarrando added.

All seven members of the Board of Fisheries were invited to the koo.éex and four attended: Israel Payton of Wasilla, Robert Ruffner of Soldotna, Al Cain of Anchorage, and Fritz Johnson of Dillingham.

They were given gifts, such as herring-shaped chocolates and traditional headbands made of yellow and red cedar.

Johnson says the board likes when different interest groups find common ground.

“Come to compromise solutions where it seems there may be none readily available,” he said. “It really enhances the process because nobody really understands local issues better than local people.”

Right now, compromise is days away and there’s competing herring proposals on the table.

Sitka Tribe of Alaska has put forward Proposal 99 (STA Proposal 99), calling for more conservative management of the fishery.

The proposal tells the board to cap the harvest rate at 10 percent.

Sitka currently uses a more generous formula than anywhere in Southeast, a sliding scale between 12 and 20 percent.

Proposal 98 (Thoms_Proposal98), sponsored by Andrew Thoms, calls for reducing the sliding scale even further (between zero and 10 percent).

Another option he suggests is setting aside herring for the ecosystem.

“Leave a third for the birds,” he wrote in his proposal.

Sitka’s local advisory committee heard these cries for conservation.

Amending Proposal 99 during their Nov. 28 meeting, they advised the board to research what it would mean to adopt that more conservative formula used by the rest of Southeast in Sitka.

The amendment to Proposal 99 reads: The guideline harvest level for the herring sac roe fishery in Sections 13-A and 13-B shall be established by the department using a percentage that is not less than 10 percent, not more than 20 percent and within that range shall be determined by the following formula: Percentage Harvest Rate = 8 + 2 (Forecast Spawning Population Size / threshold level). The fishery will not be conducted when the spawning biomass is less than 25,000 tons.

The Sitka Assembly voted last week to support the conservation position of Sitka Tribe of Alaska and the local advisory committee (Res 2018-02).

The math is tricky, but the important thing to know is the Southeast formula would limit fishing opportunity in Sitka.

Within the 2018 forecasted mature biomass of 55,637 tons, Alaska Department of Fish and Game’s statewide fisheries scientist Sherri Dressel calculates the herring fleet’s quota would go down from 11,128 tons (20 percent) to 6,927 tons (12.45 percent).

That means more herring in the ocean, but also millions of dollars in losses for the industry.

There’s no official estimate, but commercial stakeholders often say that for every ton not fished, the industry loses $1,000.

Southeast Herring Conservation Alliance represents the fleet.

Executive director Steve Reifenstuhl told the Sitka Assembly last week that these losses extend to the local economy.

“(The means) over $100,000 in raw fish tax, bed tax, lost electrical receipts, and a huge multiplier effect to our economy,” Reifenstuhl said. “The worst thing is that this will not solve the stated issue: more herring eggs on the dock.”

He argued that the problem isn’t over-fishing, but that the annual subsistence need is too high. The annual subsistence need is currently 136,000 to 237,000 pounds.

Calling the ANS “artificially inflated,” the Southeast Herring Conservation Alliance has put forward proposal 94 (SHCA 94) to substantially lower the subsistence take.

They also are recommending the board re-open the “core spawning area” closest to town to commercial fishing (SHCA 104), while Sitka Tribe wants more waters sealed off (STA Proposal 105STA Proposal 106).

These battling proposals, with their differing opinions on health of the local herring stock, will come to a head with two days of testimony.

For those planning to take the microphone, Jordan has one piece of advice: tell the board a story:

“A compelling, credible, short story from you is what resonates,” he said.

And even though it’s tempting to use all three minutes, he added, cut it down to two minutes.


Recent headlines

High wind warning for downtown Juneau & Douglas on Saturday
X