Tlingit battle helmets were designed to inspire fear. The thick, wooden head armor carried imagery of strong warriors, fierce animals or revered ancestors.
But helmets also played a ceremonial role, representing clans or helping shamans scout behind enemy lines.
When Alexander Baranov led Russian fur traders into Southeast in the late 1700s, he met some fierce resistance.
The Alaska State Museum’s Steve Henrikson said Tlingit warriors appeared one night within their camp.
“He has a very vivid description of how terrified this made everybody seem because these big figures just materialized in the middle of their camp. Because of the layers of padding, they were all really big and tall. The helmet might add another 6 to 8 inches,” he said.
But they were exceptions. Henrikson, the museum’s collections curator, said most warriors did battle with little to protect them, beyond animal hides.
The carved, painted helmets, bentwood face shields and wooden body armor was just too bulky.
“The types of battles that they had often required lots of quick movements and if you’re wearing that armor, it’s fairly heavy and bulky and it restricts your movements. So it would only be employed in very strategic ways,” he said.
Henrikson presented images and information at a Dec. 1, 2016, Sealaska Heritage Institute lecture, Terrifying Visages: Armored Warriors of the Northern Northwest Coast, at the Walter Soboleff Building in Juneau.
He showed examples of helmets adorned with sea lion whiskers and animal skins.
“Some helmets used the headskin of a bear, a brown bear stretched over a plain, wooden form,” he said.
Battle helmets were thick, made out of burls and other off-grain pieces of wood, which were harder to penetrate or crack.
Henrickson said the origins and ages of many are not known. But one whale design points to a possible origin.
“This one has a seal in its mouth and that may point to it being from the Killer Whale Chasing Seal House of Angoon,” he said.
Henrikson and his fellow researchers have tracked down nearly 100 helmets in museums in the U.S. and overseas.
And sometimes they just show up at an auction. That was the case for one recent find, which appears to represent a merganser, a crested duck with a serrated beak found in Alaska waters.
“Again, no documentation. It was just found in a castle in France. But it’s purely Tlingit,” he said.
He said there’s no question Southeast’s Haidas and Tsimshians made armor too. But so far, most examples are Tlingit.
Armor was made of wood, animal hides or both, sometimes held together by sinew or yarn.
Henrickson said they were strengthened by other materials, including outdated Chinese coins brought in by Russian fur traders.
“They were able to get a good deal on them and they brought them out here and Northwest Coast Natives used them for decorating their regalia but also to maybe make the armor more impermeable to bullets and buckshot,” he said.
That only worked for a while. Early firearms were often weak and inaccurate. As guns gained strength, armor became no match.
But it still had ceremonial use, which continues to this day. And, a number of modern artists have created their own versions for display or use in dance groups.
Hear the full lecture Terrifying Visages: Armored Warriors of the Northern Northwest Coast, with Alaska State Museum Curator of Collections Steve Henrikson.
- Lawmakers who represent areas outside Juneau receive $295 for each day of the special session. Juneau lawmakers receive $221.25 per day.
- Sixteen veterans of the Alaska Territorial Guard will be honored at a discharge ceremony today. Four of them are from Western Alaska.
- The historic houses in Juneau and Douglas were predominately built by miners and fishermen long before today's zoning was put into place. That's prevented homeowners from restoring or rebuilding homes in these neighborhoods without running into conflict with the city's zoning laws -- a temporary fix may be on the way.
- Alaska U.S. Rep. Don Young wants to know why Americans are still fighting in Afghanistan. He has co-sponsored a bill that would end funding for the war in a year, unless the president and Congress affirm the need for it.