Senator says lawsuit is likely if corporation doesn’t fully fund dividends

Sens. Anna MacKinnon, R-Eagle River and John Coghill, R-North Pole, chat during the fifth special session of Alaska's Legislature in the last two years on July 11, 2016 in Juneau, Alaska. (Photo by Rashah McChesney/KTOO)
Sen. Bill Wielechowski, D-Anchorage, talks after a floor session in July. He is seeking to have full Permanent Fund dividend checks this fall. (Photo by Rashah McChesney/KTOO)

Anchorage Democratic Sen. Bill Wielechowski wants the Alaska Permanent Fund Corporation to defy Gov. Bill Walker’s veto roughly halving this year’s dividends.

If the veto stands, then Wielechowski said he’s likely to sue to force the state to fully pay Permanent Fund dividends this fall.

Walker didn’t have the authority to veto PFD funds, Wielechowski said. In a letter sent Wednesday to Permanent Fund Corporation chief executive officer Angela Rodell, Wielechowski cites a state law that says the corporation shall transfer an amount set by a formula for dividends.

“You just simply can’t veto a statute, regardless of what appropriation is made or not,” Wielechowski said.

If it stands, then Walker’s veto will reduce the dividend from what was projected to be slightly more than $2,000 per person to $1,000. Walker said he took the step to prevent the state from exhausting all Permanent Fund earnings in the next two years, and that the veto would actually preserve PFDs into the future.

Wielechowski cites a 1994 Alaska Supreme Court decision that ruled Permanent Fund earnings go directly into the earnings reserve account.

From there, state law says half the annual deposit is distributed in PFDs.

“They very clearly said this is an automatic transfer,” Wielechowski said. “So, I think the case law is clear. The interpretation of the statute is clear. And they’ve got an obligation to transfer the full funds.”

A Permanent Fund spokeswoman referred questions to the state Department of Law. Department spokeswoman Cori Mills said the state constitution requires that all annual state spending – including dividends – is subject to the governor’s veto.

“It’s been the Department of Law’s longstanding opinion that dividends do require an appropriation, just as … any other money that is spent in the state,” Mill said. “And that’s because of the constitution’s requirement … that the legislature appropriates money. The governor then has the line-item veto power.”

Mills added that the 1994 Supreme Court case didn’t focus on Permanent Fund dividends.

if the Permanent Fund Corporation doesn’t agree to transfer the full amount, Wielechowski said that he and others would likely sue over it.

“I think there’s a  high likelihood that it’ll happen,” Wielechowski said. “I’m not going to say it with a 100-percent certainty, but I’ll just say there’s a high likelihood that there will be a lawsuit.”

Mills said the administration is prepared to defend its position, and the Permanent Fund Corporation’s position, to only transfer what was provided after Walker’s veto.

“We’d rather not get involved in a lawsuit, but that’s his right as well as any other citizen’s right,” Mills said.

Dividends are scheduled to be distributed on Oct. 6.

Andrew Kitchenman

State Government Reporter, Alaska Public Media & KTOO

State government plays an outsized role in the life of Alaskans. As the state continues to go through the painful process of deciding what its priorities are, I bring Alaskans to the scene of a government in transition.

Sign up for The Signal

Top Alaska stories delivered to your inbox every week

Site notifications
Update notification options
Subscribe to notifications