With budget deal done, oil tax reform remains elusive

House Minority Leader Chris Tuck, D-Anchorage, watches a floor session Tuesday, May 31, 2016 in Juneau, Alaska. Members of the minority broke a stalemate on the state's operating budget and joined the majority in a vote to draw from the state's savings to solve budget issues. (Photo by Rashah McChesney/KTOO)
House Minority Leader Chris Tuck, D-Anchorage, watches a floor session Tuesday May 31, 2016 in Juneau, Alaska. Members of the minority broke a stalemate on the stateÕs operating budget and joined the majority in a vote to draw from the state’s savings to solve budget issues. (Photo by Rashah McChesney/KTOO)

For months, Democrats in the legislature were clear on one thing: they would not vote for a budget unless lawmakers made major cuts to state subsidies for oil companies.

Then, Tuesday night, they did just that, voting for a budget without those cuts in place.

But the budget passed by the legislature this week doesn’t include about $775 million owed to oil companies this year. And Democrats say, if companies want those credits, there has to be oil tax reform.

Just a week ago, House Minority Leader Chris Tuck, D-Anchorage, was insisting that oil tax reform was the key to any budget deal.

“It all depends on what we do on the oil tax credits,” he told APRN last Monday.

Tuck said Democrats wouldn’t supply the votes to dip into the state’s piggy bank, the Constitutional Budget Reserve, unless there was a bill cutting future tax credits.

Fast forward one week, and Wednesday morning found Tuck and House Democrats praising a budget deal — that didn’t include the oil tax reform they’d been holding out for.

So what changed?

Democrats said they got a good deal — a budget that reverses cuts to the University of Alaska, public schools, the Marine Highway System and more — and that waiting any longer put the state at risk of a government shutdown.

And, they said, there’s still time for an oil tax deal. That’s because one thing the budget doesn’t include is money for oil tax credits.

Lawmakers are touting a $4.4 billion dollar operating budget this year, compared with about $5.2 billion last year.

That sounds like a big cut — until you realize that this year’s total doesn’t include oil tax credits. The state estimates it will owe about $775 million in cash payments to oil companies this year; the budget only allots $30 million.

Instead, lawmakers included about half the amount owed, $430 million, in a separate section of the budget (which, through a combination of accounting maneuvers and the use of leftover funds from previous budgets, will show up as an expenditure in last year’s budget, not this year’s.) And that money can only be released if some version of the oil tax reform bill, House Bill 247, passes.

Anchorage Democrat Les Gara hammered home that point during a press conference Wednesday morning.

“We used as much leverage as we could to say, you don’t even get half of the money that we owe under this terrible system unless you pass that oil tax credit bill,” Gara said.

Meanwhile, the bill itself is sitting in a conference committee, which must iron out the differences between the House and Senate.

Cathy Giessel, of Anchorage, represents Senate Republicans in those negotiations.

“I am very hopeful, actually optimistic, that we are going to arrive at a good compromise on House Bill 247,” Giessel said. “I won’t say that I have that equal confidence that it will pass both bodies.”

She means she isn’t sure it can pass the House, where several Republicans joined Democrats to pass a more sweeping reform bill.

Giessel says there is broad agreement on several points: everyone, for instance, agrees that subsidies for companies in Cook Inlet are too high and that generous tax perks for new oil should eventually expire. She hopes those changes are enough.

But Homer Rep. Paul Seaton, one of the Republicans who bucked the leadership in the House, says the bill must address credits on the North Slope, too.

“We need to limit that liability instead of just waiting for it to hit us on the head – like a hammer,” Seaton said.

Either way, lawmakers said they expect to see some new version of the oil tax reform bill soon.

Sign up for The Signal

Top Alaska stories delivered to your inbox every week

Site notifications
Update notification options
Subscribe to notifications