The Alaska Supreme Court has reaffirmed a lower court ruling that set the 2006 value of the Trans-Alaska pipeline for tax purposes at nearly $10 billion.
Oil companies had argued the 800-mile pipeline and terminal facilities should be assessed at $850 million, based on the tariffs collected. At the lower value, the property taxes that producers pay to cities like Fairbanks and Valdez would be dramatically reduced.
The Supreme Court found that tariff income isn’t the only value derived from the pipeline. The court says the pipeline’s worth also comes from its ability to transport billions of barrels of oil from the North Slope.
While Wednesday’s decision concerns only the 2006 assessment, oil companies have made similar arguments over the pipeline’s worth for other tax years.
- Juneau grappled with the water fluoridation debate a decade ago and ultimately decided to scrap fluoride. Dentists say cavities in youngsters appear to be rising though there's been no hard data to confirm this trend.
- This week, we're responding to a listener who asked whether it's true that sea ice in Antarctic waters has been generally increasing, while Arctic sea ice has seen dramatic declines.
- Sen. Lisa Murkowski said it’s too early to judge the Trump presidency. She’s been skeptical of some of his actions, but in her annual address to the Alaska Legislature this morning, Murkowski presented the Trump administration as an opportunity for resource development.
- The governor of North Dakota had set Wednesday as the evacuation deadline for the largest protest camp. The Trump administration is allowing the pipeline to be built, despite the protests.