The National Marine Fisheries Service has not followed through on its findings that two species of seals should be listed under the Endangered Species Act. The Center for Biological Diversity asked the Federal Courts on Wednesday to order a specific date by which bearded and ringed seals be listed.
In documents filed with the courts on Wednesday morning the Center said – quote – “this mandatory deadline is necessary to ensure the continued survival of ringed and bearded seals in the wild.”
The center originally petitioned the listing in 2008. After several delays the Marine Fisheries Service published its own findings that agreed with the petition and proposed the listing.
Rebecca Noblin, the Alaska Director for the Center, said that publication in December of 2010 set a one-year deadline for completion of the listing.
“In December of 2011, they issued a public notice saying they were going to take six more months to just make sure their science was right and to have more peer review. So that would have put them out to June of 2012. Since then, we haven’t heard any word for why the delay is,” Noblin said.
The court papers say that the lack of the endangered listing will result in irreparable harm to both species.
“Climate change is really, really altering the arctic quickly. As we’ve seen, this is the lowest sea-ice year ever since we’ve been recording sea ice. And sea ice is absolutely essential for these seals. The time to act is now, and NMFS has said that’s it’s planning to act. And under the Endangered Species Act it’s required to go ahead and finalize the listing decision so we can start getting some protections in place,” Noblin said.
Julie Speegle, with the National Marine Fisheries Service, said work on the listing is ongoing, but she is not allowed to comment on litigation.
- The PFD veto of $666 million covered a little more than a fifth of the budget gap.
- The CEO of the Alaska Mental Health Trust Authority stepped down on Monday. Jeff Jessee served as CEO for 21 years. According to a press release from the organization, he is transitioning to a new role ahead of his planned retirement in three years.
- The Alaska State Commission for Human Rights is the state’s anti-discrimination agency. In 2011, a legislative audit found that the agency wasn’t doing its job. Five years later, the agency is still trying to move forward.