Alaska Supreme Court denies redistricting motions

The Alaska Supreme Court has denied a motion to delay implementation of the state’s new redistricting plan.

The Riley plaintiffs to the lawsuit, from Fairbanks, filed a motion last week to block the court’s order until the U.S. Justice Department clears the plan under the Voting Rights Act. In its order the Supreme Court said it would consider a new motion if DOJ fails to approve the plan before the August 28 primary election.

The Supreme Court also has denied Petersburg’s motion calling for a rehearing on the house district’s plan. Petersburg argued that the court overlooked a “Native influence” House district in Southeast Alaska. Petersburg objects to being in a House and Senate district with downtown Juneau and maintains that it belongs in a district with smaller Southeast communities.

Meanwhile, the candidate filing deadline for the legislature remains 5 p.m. Friday (June 1). The court on Wednesday also rejected the Alaska Democratic Party’s petition to delay filing for at least two weeks.

In its May 29 petition, ADP director Kay Brown said multiple redistricting plans have created plenty of uncertainty over new district lines.

The Alaska Supreme Court last week threw out the Redistricting Board’s latest plan and adopted the April 5 version.  The ruling came just ten days before the June 1 candidate filing deadline. Brown said that was not enough time for candidates to evaluate the election district and get their paperwork to the division.

Democrats wanted the deadline extended until the U.S. Justice Department clears the plan, or at least until June 8.

State Elections director Gail Fenumiai has said no deadlines needed changing because the division mapped each scenario as it was released by the redistricting board. She said precinct boundaries for the April 5 plan have already been drawn.

[timeline width=’530′ height=’530′ font=’Merriweather-NewsCycle’ maptype=’SATELLITE’ lang=’en’ src=’https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/pub?key=0Atig135JbzQ1dDJ4MlkzeE5ydk9ZRkRvdC1ZT1JLZlE&output=html’]

Recent headlines

  • dollar bill money macro

    Per diems driving special session costs

    Lawmakers who represent areas outside Juneau receive $295 for each day of the special session. Juneau lawmakers receive $221.25 per day.
  • Caroline Hoover proudly pins an Alaska Territorial Guard medal on the front of her father's parka during an official discharge ceremony held Oct. 17 in Kipnuk, Alaska. David Martin is one of three surviving members of the Alaska Territorial Guard's Kipnuk unit. A total of 59 residents of Kipnuk, who volunteered to defend Alaska in the event of a Japanese invasion during World War II, were recognized during the ceremony. Kipnuk residents who served with the Alaska Territorial Guard from 1942-1947 were members of a U.S. Army component organized in response to attacks by the Japanese on Pearl Harbor. (Photo by Jerry Walton, Department of Military and Veterans Affairs cultural resource manager and native liaison/public domain/Wikimedia Commons)

    16 Alaska Territorial Guard vets to be honored in Anchorage

    Sixteen veterans of the Alaska Territorial Guard will be honored at a discharge ceremony today. Four of them are from Western Alaska.
  • Don Andrew Roguska looks out from an upstairs window of an historic Juneau house he bought in 2016 to restore. Zoning regulations have prevented him from rebuilding in the same style. (Photo by Jacob Resneck/KTOO)

    Juneau mulls relaxing zoning rules for historic houses

    The historic houses in Juneau and Douglas were predominately built by miners and fishermen long before today's zoning was put into place. That's prevented homeowners from restoring or rebuilding homes in these neighborhoods without running into conflict with the city's zoning laws -- a temporary fix may be on the way.
  • Young joins Afghanistan war skeptics in Congress

    Alaska U.S. Rep. Don Young wants to know why Americans are still fighting in Afghanistan. He has co-sponsored a bill that would end funding for the war in a year, unless the president and Congress affirm the need for it.
X